LooriaLooria
Open menu
Computer Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
A

119 reviews

View Product Details
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
B

77 reviews

View Product Details
Great value for its price
Significant generational improvements over previous six core twelve thread parts
Easy to install with the help of online tutorials
Good balance between gaming and productivity
Sufficient heatsink for most users
Great performance for both single and multi-core workloads
Competitive price
Customizable RGB lighting options
Quiet operation
Supports most motherboards
Not the best heatsink for overclocking
Some users have reported thermal shutdowns
Some compatibility issues with certain graphics cards
Not reaching advertised boost speeds
Some users have experienced motherboard compatibility issues
Slow loading times reported by some users

Verdict

Overall, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a highly recommended processor for those looking for a good balance between gaming and productivity. It offers significant generational improvements over previous six core twelve thread parts, and is a great value for its price. While the included heatsink may not be the best for overclocking, it is sufficient for most users. Installation is easy with the help of online tutorials, and it performs well in most games. However, some users have reported thermal shutdowns and issues with certain graphics cards, so it is important to do proper research before purchasing.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X is a highly recommended processor for mixed workloads and budget production workloads. It offers excellent single and multi-core performance at a competitive price. However, the advertised "4.6 GHz Max Boost" is misleading and more accurately described as a lie. Some users have experienced issues with motherboard compatibility and slow loading times, but overall, the processor is praised for its performance and customization options. It is a great choice for gaming and other demanding tasks.

Reviews by Topic

Our analysis shows how reviewers feel about different topics. Please note these are not full reviews.

Benchmarking

Overclocking

Cooling

All core 3,8Ghz, false advertizing; Cooler total garbage!
)! In other words, the AMD system uses 45Watts MORE than their rated TDP, than the Intel system That's not very good publicity for AMD! I can't wait to upgrade this CPU to something more efficient! This thing is garbage, compared to Intel 12nm cpus! Edit: Upon further investigation, it turns out that the stock cooler that comes with this CPU, is the reason of the poor performance, and is total garbage! The CPU isn't all to blame. The stock cooler plate, has large areas that don't touch the CPU lid (in between the heat pipes)! Under load it was thermal throttling and reducing clock speed to a mere 700MHZ on all cores!!! Serious flaw! I did find a 65W ECO setting in the BIOS, that enabled me to run all cores at 3,1Ghz on the stock cooler, about 1Ghz below it's rated speed! However, once I installed a $160 water cooling solution, the system ran at a steady 3,78-3,85Ghz at the full 105Watts (probably closer to 160W), and 3,5Ghz at 65Watts. The ECO mode is very good, once the CPU is cooled sufficiently, and still offers the same boost speeds as stock 105W, when only a few cores are active
2/5
4 years ago
amazon.com

Compatibility

Performance

Power Consumption

QUICK QUESTION!

Got an opinion on a product you've used?
If so, we want to hear from you! Write an authentic longevity review about the product and share your experience with our community. You'll have the chance to win a $100 gift card.

You might also like

More Alternatives