AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

The game was very enjoyable with almost 60 fps on average, so perhaps not enjoyable for really competitive gameplay, but it was playable in the more c...

Four point: three gigahertz a time reduction of about 4 % like the r5 3600 reviewed, the RO 9:30 isn't a huge overclock, but we couldn't get it to 4.4...

The Intel I5 11400 with B560 motherboard is probably a better value at the moment but consumes a little more power and does not offer much in the way of upgrade path. Keep in mind that any Intel "k" series processor does not have integrated graphics.

6GHz Turbo\] 12 Cores/ 24 Threads 70MB Cache 105W Processor \[+166\]. **FAN**: CyberPowerPC MasterLiquid Lite 120mm ARGB CPU Liquid Cooler with Dual Chamber Pump & Copper Cold Plate. **HDD**: 1TB WD Blue SN550 Series PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD

This will be more than enough for these six cores and 12 threads, even if we want to do some overclocking, which we will in this video. Now, if you wa...

I am beyond stoked at my 3900X build. My 3900X can run an all-core overclock of 4.5 GHz. Holy shiz

I was a little weirded out by that, but the seller came through and the chip is legit and arrived brand new in box with stock cooler, instructions, and foil badge sticker. You should pair this APU with a good mobo and memory. I chose the MSI B550 MPG Gamer Edge WiFi, and TeamGroup DDR4 3600. The mobo will be critical in determining your possible upgrade paths, and the memory is used by the AMD APUs to help with the graphics

I'll get to the point. Check your motherboard compatibility for the AM4 Matisse 3000 processors (I know most, if not all here already do) before dropping a sizeable amount on this beast of a processor.

Along with a 32GB ram kit + finally a decent fan hub by Cooler Master. The hard part was actually getting all the cables tidy and neat. I think it worked really well. Also switched my rug to a much more dust resistant one as well as custom walnut wooden raiser

)! In other words, the AMD system uses 45Watts MORE than their rated TDP, than the Intel system That's not very good publicity for AMD! I can't wait to upgrade this CPU to something more efficient! This thing is garbage, compared to Intel 12nm cpus! Edit: Upon further investigation, it turns out that the stock cooler that comes with this CPU, is the reason of the poor performance, and is total garbage! The CPU isn't all to blame. The stock cooler plate, has large areas that don't touch the CPU lid (in between the heat pipes)! Under load it was thermal throttling and reducing clock speed to a mere 700MHZ on all cores!!! Serious flaw! I did find a 65W ECO setting in the BIOS, that enabled me to run all cores at 3,1Ghz on the stock cooler, about 1Ghz below it's rated speed! However, once I installed a $160 water cooling solution, the system ran at a steady 3,78-3,85Ghz at the full 105Watts (probably closer to 160W), and 3,5Ghz at 65Watts. The ECO mode is very good, once the CPU is cooled sufficiently, and still offers the same boost speeds as stock 105W, when only a few cores are active

Running benchmarks on this machine, though, temps topped out at 77°C in my stress test (20 minutes of constant full load after having ran some smaller stress tests that had already warmed up the machine). This was before adding the duct kit, so presumably it'd be a few degrees cooler now.

I would stack this against any intel chip in the same range... this one beats it in speed and price