Canon EOS R6 vs Sony Alpha a6400

Also, having IBIS (in body image stabilization) is really wonderful and just adds extra security knowing I will get sharp images taken. It also opens up the ability to have non-stabilized lenses without worry of out-of-focus images taken. Using this body with the new "Nifty 50" (RF 50mm f1.8 STM) which doesn't have IS has helped retain sharp images much more

Full frame sensor, 10 bit color, great image stabilization and the kit lens (20-60 f3.5 to 5.6) is actually really good. We’ve soaked the camera in splashes from muddy pondwater, ran it outside in below zero temps, and it’s been great

You can play with the sliders to see the befores and the afters and if you decide to pick them up right now they are on sale or if you want to get ski...

This camera is definitely an upgrade from my a6000. But that was not my reason to buy it. I was considering the FDR-AX700 camcorder but when I saw the video recording capabilities of the a6400, it seemed like the right choice, mainly because it is much less expensive than the AX700 and smaller. But what really convinced me was that it does not shut down after only a few minutes of recording as the other alpha models and it has no recording lenght limit

No qualms about the camera picture quality. However, it is cheaply built. The on/off switch snapped off and I was just a couple of months past my 1 year warranty. It had minimal use

I really want to love it, but I’m currently frustrated by arbitrary limitations of the autofocus system. First what I like: picture quality is better than my a6000, especially at higher ISO. Build quality is more sturdy. Tracking autofocus is also much better than a6000

The eye auto focus is so magical and makes portrait photography that much more freeing to create. Camera features and handling - 10/10.

We'Re gon na see improvements across the board, okay, so here's my final thoughts on these 6400. You know out on the net, there's a lot of moaning and...

That said, its battery life leaves something to be desired, as you can't use it while it's charging. Also, while it can shoot at a quick 11 fps in its high-speed continuous shooting mode, it takes a long time to empty its photo buffer if you manage to fill it up. Still, if you're looking for a low-light powerhouse, this is a great option that should suit most people, thanks to its fantastic noise handling, great autofocus, and comfortable ergonomics.

The A7II's shutter count rating communicated by Sony was false and now a lot of A7IIs are dying prematurely, but just outside warranty. The only thing the A6400 has an edge over the X-S10 on is battery life. Fuji caught up to that camera in autofocus already and everything from stills to video to features is higher quality on the X-S10. The X-S10 has IBIS at $1000 for crying out loud

If you have a big budget get the EOS R6 with an EF adapter. Sell all of the EF-S glass and invest in a quality wide to normal (or telephoto) zoom like a 24-105.

Sony A6400 with sigma/tamron telephoto zoom lenses. Should get you into your budget nicely. Canon m50 should work as well. I’m not sure about the lens selection though

The thing i love about my r6 is just the color and the tones i get from. In other words, the pictures i get look the way i want it to look if you're l...

I used the lens that came with it twice and now it's jammed. It gives an error that says "Cannot recognize lens, please attach it properly." It is attached properly. What is the solution, according to the internet experts? To push and pull on the lens until it works again

i own that lens and find it to be excellent bang for the buck.

Only downside is for what you pay you are given rpetty cheap packaging. Like, come on Sony. This is a thousand dollar camera, you can't throw in some bells and whistles? The strap is absolute cheapy cheap quality and the camera wasn't even foam protected in it's box. My $100 Canon powershot was packaged better than this!

The articles posted the r6 is real. It's here. It's on the table. You got the top down we're gon na go through the features you already saw, some of t...

It has some really great brand new features, but it's also missing some stuff. Certainly is: is this the best mirrorless camera on the market for entr...

I recently was struggling with this decision for my EOS R6, and eventually went with the EF 24-105 F4L v1. I chose this over the 24-70 due to price, as well as having the extra zoom range (which is useful for my applications). No complaints over AF speed and IQ, both of which are better than my old gear!. One note if you choose to go with the 24-105 (especially used), check for any looseness of the zoom ring rubber

If you're a beginner I would recommend the Sony A6400 with the sigma 30mm+sigma 50mm +Sigma 16mm. Since as a beginner you'd want to know more about your equipment and would be in the learning stages. Now if you have the money and don't mind spending then the A7III is a no brainer. But to be honest if you're just starting out I suggest go for a A6400 with the sigma lens which would suit your needs