Sony Alpha a6000

This thing is a beast when it comes to photos. It's faster It has faster autofocus And overall in low light it just completely trounces the canon m50 ...

But overall, I bought this, you know, because it's portability, it's quality, it's video, and it has not failed to disappoint me whatsoever. So the So...

As I mentioned already, no 4K video support and no 120 frames per second at any resolution means that it is starting to fall quite a way behind newer ...

Now, one of the biggest pros of the A6000 would have to be the value. Now there are five other Sony APS-C cameras out that have been released after th...

Recently bought one of these so I can use my A6000 as a web cam. It works quite well, and the picture quality is quite good. You might notice some compression artifacts if you're capturing a desktop, but for a camera it works well.

It's a **lot** more expensive (US$165), but it's worth it in my view, if you carry the camera a lot. I've used RRS L-plates on my 20D, 5D, 5DII, 6D, a6000, and now R6. Never had a problem with them, never had one come loose.

I honestly don't see many arguments against this system, except for the hassle and expense of exchanging the lenses. As for Sony crop, they are almost none-existing on the second hand market, except for the A6000. The price of a brand new a6600 is the same as a used a7III, so a brand new a6400 would be the only attractive choice, as it costs the same as the used 5D mk III and X-T3 mentioned above.