Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

Alright, so definitely I think it was worth the money to upgrade, I'm glad I spent the extra money, I feel like I'm going to really enjoy this lens. A...

6, the vignetting is completely gone and the edges are also much sharper So what's my final say on this lens? This is actually a pretty good lens. The...

Definitely consider it within your kit arsenal if you're using a D5000, 7000, 3000 series is this lens right here. But also know that yes, it's going ...

8 that remains constant throughout the zoom range. It's quite small and lightweight and feels pretty robust but the main difference lies beneath the s...

It makes a great portrait lens too. It's slightly wider in the aperture vs the 35m, so you get more light and more blur but I don't think you'd be able to tell much difference. * Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 (or Canon 17-55mm f/2,8, or Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8) - These are great replacements to the kit lens as it's a near identical focal range (zoom range), but they have a wider aperture than the kit lens.

I bought this lens when buying a new Nikon D5600 after shooting with an old Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 on an older Nikon DLSR for many years. I chose this lens over buying a new Tamron 17-50mm because I was interested in the faster hyper-sonic focus motor, the optical image stabilization, and just wanted t...

\- 75% Sigma -> 30% at 17-18mm; 20% at 20-28mm; 10% at 28-38mm; 10% at the max of 50mm. \- 23% 10-18 -> 8% at 10mm; 6% at 11-13mm; 6% at 18mm. So the Sigma could cover more than 80% of pictures, and actually, if I go out just to take a few pictures I am usually happy with the Sigma alone and take the others for specific things.

This is a great 3rd party lens for APS-C sensor cameras with sharp optics and a constant f 2.8 aperture for all focal lengths. AS others have reviewed, there is a bit of fall off in the edges 18mm at f 2.8, but for most, this is not a huge problem and it remains far better than the kit lens it typic...

The Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8. An amazing lens for the price and arguably one of the best choices for hiking and traveling.

Brighter and sharper than Canon stock len 18-55mm STM. it is much much heavier than Canon one and appears much better build than Canon. Canon one is too plastic and appear cheaply made. I did a comparison shoots with Canon stock len 18-55mm STM and its Ef-s 24mm f2.8 prime. It is in controlled shot ...